Comment on “do Zero-energy Soluiions of Maxwell Equations Have the Physical Ori- Gin Suggested by A. E. Chubykalo?” by V.v. Dvoeglazov

Dvoeglazov’s paper is not trivial because we know the classical definition of any non-trivial truth: a truth is not trivial if and only if an opposite statement is not false (and vice versa, of course). So I strongly recommend his paper for a reader. But I have a few notes: 1) V. Dvoeglazov writes in his footnote number 7: ”In my opinion, equations (20,21) of ref. [1] are just another form of the Maxwell equations for this particular case, in the sense that there is no new physical content if one expects that the Maxwell electrodynamics describes also the Coulomb interaction.” The point is that precisely this (“another”) form of the Maxwell equations (namely with total derivatives!) allows us to describe the Coulomb interaction as an action-at-a-distance (it was shown in [2]). It is well-known that generally accepted Maxwell equations (with partial derivatives only) describe just transverse electromagnetic waves in vacuum which spread with a limited velocity